Warm blankets and warming devices are easy-to-apply interventions that prevent a patient's temperature from dipping below 36 ?C before, during and after surgery. So why is inadvertent perioperative hypothermia still an issue? Spectrum Healthcare Partners, a multispecialty physician-owned medical group based in Southport, Maine, had been documenting how many patients are normothermic when they come out of the OR at the group's former orthopedic surgery centers.
"We'd been measuring that rate for a long time within our anesthesia group," says Miriam Dowling-Schmitt, MS, RN, CPHQ, CPPS, director of quality at Spectrum. "Although a majority of our patients were emerging from surgery normothermic, we noticed some opportunities for improvement."
The ultimate push for change came at the start of 2018, when CMS began requiring the documentation of a normothermic temperature reading within 15 minutes of a patient's arrival in the PACU as a quality metric of the Ambulatory Surgery Center Quality Reporting (ASCQR) Program. Spectrum seized the opportunity to review their internal data to make sure the patient warming practices at the surgery centers met the ASCQR's national benchmark of 95% or more of patients being normothermic in recovery.
Ms. Dowling-Schmitt launched a quality improvement project based on methodology used in Lean Six Sigma: Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control (DMAIC).
- Define and measure. They began by identifying the problem and assessing why it was happening. Ms. Dowling-Schmitt's team reviewed the records of patients who did not meet the normothermic metric and discovered 87.1% of patients who underwent procedures lasting 60 minutes or longer under general or neuraxial anesthesia were normothermic in the PACU — below the 95% threshold.
- Analyze. After the team determined the extent of the issue, they drilled down to its root causes. Ms. Dowling-Schmitt says they reviewed 674 patient records to determine how staff were recording patient temperatures and documenting the readings. Were patients colder than they should have been in the PACU because their core temperatures were truly low or because temperatures were documented incorrectly? "We had to understand the underlying causes of the issue to identify what improvements needed to be made," says Ms. Dowling-Schmitt.
She discovered the center's flow sheet had only a single space for staff to record a patient's temperature. Nurses could jot down a patient's initial temperature reading, but had no place to note remeasurements after warming interventions were applied.
"We also realized the forehead monitoring strips staff used measured temperatures in two-degree increments," says Ms. Dowling-Schmitt. "They were useful for recognizing large temperature swings, which could indicate the onset of malignant hyperthermia, but they didn't provide the accuracy needed for a quality reporting metric."
The quality improvement project revealed staff used both Fahrenheit and Celsius readings to record and document patients' temperatures. The lack of standardization created confusion among members of the care team, who didn't always know how to convert one temperature scale to the other and therefore weren't clear on when to apply active warming methods to hypothermic patients.
Additionally, the surgery center did not have a temperature monitoring and management protocol in place to identify and treat patients who arrived for surgery in a hypothermic state or for high-risk patients — such as frail, older individuals without significant body mass — who needed to be prewarmed before surgery.