Innovations in Shoulder Replacement Surgery

Share:

Augmented reality and new implant technologies are helping surgeons place implants more precisely and effectively.


Shoulder replacements can be difficult to perform, especially when anatomical deformities in the joint and missing bone in the scapula increase the complexity of placing the implant as accurately as possible. Surgeons often adapt on the fly by adjusting the size, position or orientation of the implant or by using grafts to buttress native bone, but emerging technologies are taking some of the guesswork and challenge out of achieving optimal outcomes.

Computer navigation lets surgeons assess the patient’s specific anatomy before surgery to decide where implants should be optimally placed and oriented, and what size implants are needed. Surgeons upload the data into a software platform in the OR and execute the plan as closely as possible. “Computer navigation has been one of the biggest advancements in shoulder replacement surgery over the past decade,” says John-Erik Bell, MD, an orthopedic surgeon at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center and Clinics in Lebanon, N.H. “Augmented reality (AR) glasses take the technology to the next level by overlaying the digital plan in the surgeon’s direct line of sight, so they don’t have to divert their attention away from the patient.”

AT THEIR FINGERTIPS Augmented reality glasses let Dr. Michael Khazzam interact with pre-op surgical plans in real time.  |  UT Southwestern Medical Center

AR turns static computerized preoperative planning into a dynamic intraoperative tool. Surgeons can call up 3D models of the patient’s joint anatomy, see what it would look like to take the arm through the entire range of motion or refer to the CT scan taken before surgery to review cystic changes in parts of the joint or confirm they’re working in areas with fragile bone structures. “Surgeons see the surgical plan in real time and adjust it as needed,” says Michael Khazzam, MD, an associate professor of orthopedic surgery at UT Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas. “They know they’re placing implants in ways that match the pre-op plan.”

Dr. Bell says spending time before surgery going over the unique aspects of each case and developing a surgical plan based on the patient’s unique shoulder anatomy gives him more confidence while he’s operating. The AR glasses — they’re a bit thicker than standard eyewear, but don’t interfere with the sterility hood, mask and headlight he wears — display the digital information in his line of sight. “I can refer to the data throughout surgery to confirm that I’m following the surgical plan,” he explains. For example, he uses the AR overlay as a targeted guide, lining up small crosshairs on horizontal and vertical axes to identify where he should be placing screws or pins and orienting the implant.

Surgical navigation and AR have the potential to improve shoulder replacements, even if long-term clinical evidence for the burgeoning technologies is not yet available, according to Dr. Bell. “Anything that helps surgeons place implants more accurately will have a positive effect on outcomes data,” he says.

“Surgeons place non-anatomic implants into an anatomic structure and change some of the surrounding anatomy,” says Dr. Khazzam, who recently used AR to reconstruct a patient’s shoulder with a 3D-printed glenoid baseplate generated from a pre-op CT scan and computerized planning software. “We’re all chasing the restoration of the joint to as close to normal anatomy as possible. Navigation software allows us to be better at identifying potential problem areas and improving implant placement based on factors such as thickness, width and offsets.”

Several studies have shown that computerized pre-op planning improves the accuracy of implant placement, according to Dr. Khazzam. He says AR advances the potential of the technology by allowing surgeons to seamlessly interact with the information to confirm they’re performing surgery as well as they believe. Early functional outcomes — including range of motion and the patient’s ability to return to full activity — of AR-assisted shoulder replacements are currently being studied.

Dr. Khazzam says artifical intelligence is in the infancy of being used to review patterns of high-volume surgeons who use navigation software, but the ongoing analysis of big data will eventually identify the best surgical approaches and optimal positions for implants based on specific types of anatomy.

Advances in implant designs are also contributing to improved outcomes. Dr. Bell often uses stemless humeral implants for anatomic shoulder replacements. The implants, which have been popular in Europe for many years and are beginning to gain traction in the U.S., require good bone density for implantation. “There are several theoretical advantages to using stemless implants,” explains Dr. Bell. “Although current studies don’t show that they improve short-term outcomes, they could make replacements easier to revise 15 to 20 years after the primary surgery.”

Surgeons want to preserve as much bone as possible when placing implants, according to Dr. Khazzam, who says stemless implants let them accomplish that goal on the humeral side of the joint. “Stemless designs are allowing surgeons to become accurate and precise in protecting more of the native bone and lessening issues related to stress shielding,” he adds. “Newer implants with porous surfaces also allow for bone integration into the metal, which can lead to better fixation than implants secured with cement.”

The number of primary shoulder replacements, both anatomic and reverse, are increasing exponentially due to an aging patient population, says Dr. Khazzam. He also points to increasing numbers of young, fellowship-trained shoulder specialists who are comfortable taking on complex cases as a contributing factor to the majority of procedures being performed on an outpatient basis.

“Overall rates of shoulder replacements are rising significantly,” says Dr. Bell, who performs about two-thirds of his procedures in the same-day setting. “It’s been proven to be a safe outpatient procedure for properly selected patients.” OSM

Related Articles

Wired for Success

In her 24 years as a nurse at Penn Medicine, Connie Croce has seen the evolution from open to laparoscopic to robotic surgery....

To Optimize OR Design, Put People First

Through my decades of researching, testing and helping implement healthcare design solutions, I’ve learned an important lesson: A human-centered and evidence-based...