Trend to Watch: The Rise of Robotic Hysterectomy

Robotic Assistance Patient Experience Financial Management OB-GYN

By: Dan Cook | Editor-in-Chief

Published: 5/10/2022

Share:

Increased competition among robot manufacturers will boost access to the minimally invasive approach surgeons and patients prefer.


Hysterectomy is the second most common surgery for women performed in the U.S., second only to cesarean section, and increasing numbers of surgeons are opting to perform it while sitting at the controls of the da Vinci surgical system. Intuitive Surgical’s workhorse has dominated the robotic surgery market for decades thanks to patents protecting its key design features. Those patents have begun to expire, however, opening the door for increased competition that is expected to drive down the cost of the technology as several companies enter the field with streamlined platforms designed with budget-conscious facilities in mind.

There are currently about a half-dozen new robotic platforms on the market or in the pipeline that will vie with the da Vinci for OR space, according to John Lenihan, MD, a gynecologic surgeon at MultiCare Tacoma (Wash.) General Hospital. Dr. Lenihan calls the da Vinci the “Cadillac” of robotic platforms and believes it will continue to lead the market for the foreseeable future, but he says its multimillion-dollar price tag and the ongoing expense of maintaining it — instrument arms that cost $750,000 each and service contracts that run $100,000 per year — have priced it out of most outpatient surgical facilities. “It’s never been a realistic option for surgery centers,” he says.

Some of the new robots that are set to enter the field are being developed by major players in the field of surgery, including Medtronic and Johnson & Johnson. That will allow for the bundling of supply costs, another factor that could lead to more facilities adding the technology. For example, one of the major players could include the cost of the robot into a larger contract with facilities, which would purchase surgical supplies — gowns, masks, drapes, sutures — from the robot manufacturer in exchange for getting the platform at a discounted price.

The increased competition among robot makers and growing interest in robotic hysterectomy among gynecologic surgeons will lead to about 80% of hysterectomies being performed with robotic assistance over the next decade, according to Dr. Lenihan. “Not only because the cost of the technology will come down, but also because newer robots will be easier to use,” he says. “Cost-effective and user-friendly platforms will be ideally suited for surgery centers, where specialized teams can focus on performing robotic hysterectomies easier and faster.” 

Ergonomic and effective

EXACT SCIENCE Surgeons perform more precisely when operating with the robot’s six degrees of movement.

Women undergo hysterectomies for a variety of reasons, including benign gynecologic conditions and ovarian cancer. “My approach is to use the surgical technique that’s the best fit for an individual patient,” says Bruce Kahn, MD, director of the Scripps Fellowship in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery at Scripps Health in San Diego. That includes performing vaginal surgery and laparoscopic procedures, both of which work well and benefit patients, according to Dr. Kahn. However, he prefers to operate with the robot because of the benefits the technology provides.

Surgeons are afforded 3D views of the surgical field, letting them zoom in to see target anatomy in greater detail. They enjoy increased maneuverability with instrumentation thanks to the robot’s six degrees of movement — the in-out, open-close, twist-right, twist-left action of conventional laparoscopic tools plus wrist-like movements to get around corners and improve access to anatomy. “It’s like working with your hands inside the patient,” says Dr. Kahn. “The technology helps surgeons operate more effectively.”

Over the past 16 years, Dr. Lenihan has transitioned to operating almost exclusively with the robot, regardless of the perceived complexity of the procedure. “The advantage of operating with robotic assistance is that you can take on all cases, especially as more involved procedures move to the outpatient setting,” he says. “I think robots will have an influence on the continued migration of cases to ambulatory facilities. There’s no question Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols are a big part of that trend, but the robot is playing a part.”

Outcomes in terms of cancer resections and survival rates are comparable between laparoscopic and robotic procedures, according to Dr. Lenihan, but he says patient satisfaction tends to be higher when the robot is used. He once performed a robotic hysterectomy on a female police officer whose mother had a conventional procedure performed a week earlier by another surgeon. “I saw the daughter at her two-week checkup and cleared her to go back on active duty,” says Dr. Lenihan. “Meanwhile, her mother still needed assistance walking up and down stairs and was upset with the difficulty of the recovery.”

Some surgeons believe the vaginal approach is still the most minimally invasive of all the hysterectomy techniques. However, Dr. Lenihan points to studies and his own experience to note that vaginal surgeries are physically taxing for surgeons. The laparoscopic approach is less physically demanding, although ergonomic issues inherent to the technique can cause significant repetitive strain injuries and cut short the careers of high-volume surgeons.

Operating with the robot essentially eliminates those concerns and takes the procedure to another level, according to Dr. Lenihan. “The robot lets surgeons perform better surgeries,” he says. “They have better vision, improved access to the surgical field and better control of the instruments. They can operate more effectively and more comfortably.”

Performing robotic surgery is a learned skill, one Dr. Lenihan equates to flying a plane. He had been operating for 30 years before he started performing robotic hysterectomies. “It was like being a rookie surgeon all over again,” he says. “Trying to learn completely new skill sets is difficult for established surgeons who are trying to build patient volumes or keep pace with current caseloads.”

Plus, points out Dr. Lenihan, many gynecologists focus their practice on labor and delivery and women’s health issues, and therefore aren’t necessarily highly skilled surgeons — at least compared to other specialties. That means some low-volume surgeons don’t have the repetitions needed to master robotic techniques. Dr. Lenihan points to emerging virtual reality training platforms that could flatten the learning curve for surgeons and increase their use of the technology, and ultimately increase access to it for their patients.

Machine learning and artificial intelligence will be incorporated into future generations of robots to help guide surgeons to complete more accurate and safer surgeries, according to Dr. Lenihan. “They will still perform the actual dissections and resections, but the robots will use infrared guidance and overlays to identify the exact locations of instruments in relation to anatomy and exactly where they need to cut,” he explains.

Evolving care

POPULAR OPINION Dr. John Lenihan believes many surgeons will perform hysterectomies with robotic assistance in the coming years.

Outpatient hysterectomy is still a developing trend based on the acceptance of the practice among patient populations in specific regions of the country and the preferences of individual surgeons, according to Dr. Kahn. He says Scripps is one of the few programs in the country that performs most hysterectomies on an outpatient basis. 

The health system is now planning to turn an old hospital structure into a surgery center that will house robotic equipment. The new space will allow surgeons to schedule robotic hysterectomies in an outpatient facility where dedicated teams will perform a high volume of procedures. “A team-based approach is one of the keys to success in robotic surgery,” says Dr. Kahn. 

Increasing numbers of robotic platforms will expand use of the technology in the surgery center setting. Younger surgeons who are training on the platforms will also help drive more widespread adoption. “The da Vinci will continue to be the gold standard for the next five to 10 years, but the other platforms, especially those offered by larger companies, will begin to find niches in the market and work their way into more surgical facilities,” says Dr. Lenihan. “I believe we’ll look back to the adoption of robotic hysterectomy in much the same way we now view the move from open to laparoscopic procedures.” OSM

Related Articles