Rothman has developed multiple checklists for assessing swallowing, sleep apnea, airways and other factors to determine if a patient can safely undergo an outpatient ACDF. The providers also employ an intricate algorithm and navigational system
to determine whether patients meet the health system’s clinical guidelines for identifying appropriate candidates for outpatient procedures. Navigators review the electronic medical records of approximately 2,200 patients a week. An
artificial intelligence program is used to analyze patients’ height, weight, comorbidities, age, prior surgeries, smoking history and other characteristics. Patients are also asked a series of questions geared toward determining the
level of social support they have at home on which they can rely for help immediately after the surgery. The results go into a computer program that designates patients as one of three colors:
•
Green: The patient is approved for outpatient surgery.
•
Yellow: The patient has risk factors that might be modifiable.
•
Red: The patient is not a candidate for outpatient surgery.
The patient-selection methods Rothman uses can also help patients get on board with modifying their pre-surgical comorbidities, says Dr. Vaccaro. For instance, it’s possible to lower a patient from a physical status classification of ASA
3 (which identifies the presence of serious systemic disease) to ASA 2 (which indicates only mild systemic disease). When that’s deemed possible, the case is delayed until the patient improves to the point at which they can undergo outpatient
surgery.
Dr. Tyndall says he won’t perform an outpatient ACDF on an otherwise healthy 45-year-old patient if their BMI is 40 or above. “It makes even minimally invasive approaches much harder simply because there’s so much more tissue
to work through,” he says. “That means it’s going to be a longer procedure and therefore there will be more risks for complications, so it’s better to work with most of these patients in an inpatient environment.”
Lumbar fusions, says Dr. Tyndall, can be performed safely in an outpatient setting on patients with BMIs as high as 50. He offers patients who are above that threshold the option of delaying surgery until they lose their excess weight. If they
can’t or won’t, an inpatient surgery is scheduled. Dr. Tyndall says he always makes the effort to optimize his patients preoperatively, but a significant percentage of them smoke, drink and are slightly overweight. Results at optimization
with these individuals are mixed and often aren’t good enough to tangibly improve their outcomes.
Dr. Vaccaro performs roughly a third of his surgeries in ASCs and many of his hospital patients are discharged within 23 hours. In total, he says, about 60% of his patients are home within 23 hours of their procedures.
For patients who aren’t comfortable or able to go home that soon, many ASCs affiliated with health systems are building Ritz Carlton-like recovery suites. Patients who need more time to recover are moved to a suite, where they’re observed
by a nurse. The overnight stay costs about $250, much less than the $2,000 the same level of care would cost in a hospital.
“In addition to providing patients with extra comfort and saving money, it also allows us to treat more patients, such as those with varying ASA scale ratings whose cases might involve slightly higher complexities,” says Dr. Vaccaro.
Rothman’s recovery suites, for instance, have increased the number of ASA 3 patients who can safely undergo surgery in the outpatient setting, a development that has decreased the inpatient population and saved the healthcare system
significant money.