CRNAs Focus on Staff Wellness and Patient Safety
The American Association of Nurse Anesthesiology (AANA) has joined the ALL IN: Wellbeing First for Healthcare coalition, saying the group’s initiative to improve the...
This website uses cookies. to enhance your browsing experience, serve personalized ads or content, and analyze our traffic. By clicking “Accept & Close”, you consent to our use of cookies. Read our Privacy Policy to learn more.
By: Hellen Johnson
Published: 4/3/2019
The evidence is clear: to fully clean and disinfect the OR, manual cleaning alone just doesn't cut it. Despite your turnover team's best efforts to wipe and mop every inch of cart, counter, table and floor, studies show that up to half of all operating room surfaces will remain contaminated with pathogens — including multidrug-resistant organisms such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) — when you wheel the next patient in. The shortcomings of manual cleaning have ushered in a new era of whole-room disinfection technology. Which whole-room system is right for your facility? Let's start by considering:
Personnel/staffing. Do you have staff available to oversee a technology that requires manual remote operation, room evacuation/sealing and device repositioning?
It helps to categorize whole-room disinfection technologies by their time-dependent mode of operation: Is it episodic or continuous?
Episodic disinfection includes mobile ultraviolet-C (UV-C) devices, hydrogen peroxide vapor (HPV) or mist systems, and ozone systems that provide disinfection within a discrete period of time in an unoccupied space because of safety concerns. You can deploy these devices at the end of the day or between cases, with varying "run" times.
A few disadvantages to mobile UV-C systems: They're only safe for use in unoccupied spaces, limiting them to intermittent disinfection. And despite their "automated" nature, staff must deploy, maintain and monitor the units. While some facilities have the staff to assume this responsibility, others may find it prohibitive.
A larger concern: Not knowing if you've delivered the appropriate dose to all areas of a room. Some systems have remote sensors you can position throughout a room; if the adequate dose is not registered, you can reposition and redeploy the device. Others measure light reflected back to the device, but this isn't truly representative of the dose delivered throughout a space, as different surfaces reflect light to varying degrees. In Europe, you can place disposable dosimeters anywhere throughout a room to document the dose achieved in those locations.
This delivered-dose measurement is critical. Research has shown that UV-C disinfection is limited by the distance between the light source and the targeted surface — especially in shadowed areas or areas not in the direct line of light — and in the presence of organic matter.
A final concern: Repeated exposure to mercury-based UV-C light can result in degradation of some plastics and polymers.
A key drawback to hydrogen peroxide systems: They are toxic to humans, so the treated room must not only be unoccupied, but also tightly sealed so that no vapors or mists escape. Trained personnel are required to oversee a treatment, which can run as long as 2 to 3 hours, presenting logistical challenges for both OR and housekeeping staff.
Like UV-C, repeated exposure to hydrogen peroxide vapors and mists can corrode plastics and polymers. Also like UV-C, these vapors/mists can only provide intermittent disinfection, effectively addressing contamination during treatment, but not in between or during cases.
For continuous disinfection in both occupied and vacant spaces, consider upper room or shielded ceiling UV-C, visible light/high-intensity narrow-spectrum light and dry hydrogen peroxide systems.
Some tips for building a case to acquire whole-room disinfection technology.
Newer ceiling UV-C systems have solved this exposure problem by drawing air into a ceiling-mounted unit with a shielded UV-C lamp inside. Air is drawn in through a filter, disinfected and blown out by an internal fan, helping to recirculate the disinfected air. These systems offer a novel way of treating contaminated air and improving air quality. Studies have shown their effectiveness against both bacteria and fungi in the air; however, the impact on surface contamination remains to be studied.
You can place DHP systems in an existing HVAC system. Like hydrogen peroxide vapors and ozone, DHP can disinfect an entire room because air carries it to both high- and low-touch/center and remote surfaces. A recent study evaluating surface contamination of obscure, low-touch surfaces (those not likely to be addressed with manual cleaning) demonstrated a 93% reduction after just 7 days of DHP use and a 98% reduction at 30 days. This underscores the ability of DHP, much like hydrogen peroxide vapors, to achieve whole-room disinfection by reaching all surfaces within a space.
From an operational standpoint, DHP systems offer an advantage not only because they don't impact room turnover time — a critical factor for facilities with high caseloads — but also because, like upper room UV-C or visible light systems, they are truly automated and don't require staff to operate or oversee. They're also far less expensive than mobile UV-C or hydrogen peroxide vapor systems.
Drawback: DHP is less potent in the presence of water, so its efficacy is diminished on wet surfaces.
Several studies over the past decade have shown effective reductions in environmental surface contamination in a number of healthcare settings, including one study that demonstrated use in the OR was associated with a concomitant reduction in periprosthetic joint SSIs — one of the costliest and devastating surgical site infections. To date, there have been no studies on air disinfection.
These ceiling-mounted systems contain a combination of violet and white light-emitting diodes (LED) to provide the necessary illumination. They are automated, and some are equipped with an occupancy sensor that lets the light switch to a higher and more germicidal dose of high-intensity narrow spectrum— or HINS — light when the room is unoccupied. Their ability to be used in an occupied space is a notable advantage over UV-C light. OSM
The American Association of Nurse Anesthesiology (AANA) has joined the ALL IN: Wellbeing First for Healthcare coalition, saying the group’s initiative to improve the...
Once you understand that being a perfectionist can be harmful to your personal outlook, health and anxiety level, you can unravel what to do about it....
The start of the year is a great time to clear the decks mentally and review for yourself what works and what does not....